GreenfieldNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Village Buzz - September 26th...

By Al Campbell
Friday, Sep 26 2008, 08:52 AM

"Your mission, should you decide to accept..."

That lead-in to the old Mission Impossible television show came to mind as I pondered today's Village Buzz topic possibilities.

I take some of our elected representatives to task now and then, and some of you readers do the same in your comments.  Maybe it is time for us to "put up or shut up" as the old saying goes (not really but it gets the point across).  If we have ideas as to how our governing entities could do things differently, lets put those on the table and see if any grow legs.

For example, we see privatized prisons popping up around the country.  That happened because the private sector found a use for capital that took a burden from the shoulders of the taxpayer.  I read of the latest Scott Walker budget proposals for Milwaukee County and thought that he has to be among the most creative politicians I've seen in some time (and, I hope he runs for Governor again).

What is there in our small world that could be done differently if we were to 'color outside the lines' for awhile?  At the risk of angering entrenched interests, I'll throw out a few thoughts along those lines (remember that there may be some current impediments but that most impediments are man-made and could be altered if we demanded that):

Why not look to the private sector to build a school building that we can lease?  The lessor could be obligated to handle all repairs, for example, over the term of the lease to assure that things that break get fixed on a timely basis instead of being delayed until they manifest as something worse.  I see many former hospitals that have been turned into apartment buildings, for example.  Just because a building is built to house students, doesn't have to mean that it would always be a school building.  As population ebbs and flows, this would give the taxpayer some welcomed flexibility.  Would this be workable?  We won't know unless we ask the questions.

What about a charter school or an Internet school option to take student-count pressure off the buildings now available?  Might that also reduce the personnel costs? 

Many communities have hired assessor organizations and building inspector organizations to do their specialized work instead of retaining this talent on their own payrolls.  Why not go through an extensive review of what we could do along those lines.  That might reduce costs.  It might eliminate our angst over rising benefit costs that have been negotiated and about which we can do nothing even as we watch the private sector deal with those same issues.  Current employees with those skills might welcome the opportunity to become entrepreneurs and build new companies that other communities could employ.

Would it be possible to contract for road repair and shift some of the uncertainties off onto a private sector entity?  Private business is accustomed to taking risk.  Government tends to have to avoid risk and that adds expense.  Road salting and snow plowing, for example, is a real problem given a hard winter and higher salt costs.  If a private firm were contracted, it would bear that risk.  I see many landscape firms that become snow plowers and salters in the winter.  Is that worth exploring?

Would it make sense to lease computer servers for the village's use and have those housed in a private data center that does that as its primary business?  The village wouldn't have need for the IT skills that it might today.  Leasing of such systems might prove more economical and is an expense for which we could plan.

In most of these examples, the private sector would probably be more efficient, less susceptible to the political winds that blow hot and then cold, more intent on running very tightly controlled operations, etc.  Where there is a true risk/reward relationship that is properly negotiated and vetted, I believe that the private sector is simply better at that than is a government body.  And, as the "sidewalk" issue shows, I feel certain that the private sector can get things done in shorter time periods in most cases.

"Your mission, should you decide to accept" is to come up with your own ideas that might be capable of altering the way we look at the world of Germantown government and the Germantown school system today.  I look forward to your comments...if you are brave enough/foolish enough to offer those.  Most of you, at least, have anonymity on your side.  I'm just hanging out there with my zipper down.

Comments

GTT   

To add to your school suggestion, if the school board doesn't like the idea of leasing a building, or if the referendum fails again, why doesn't the board look to the public for private donations to help finance the building of a school. They and others that feel so strongly that it is needed can approach individuals or businesses in the community or even the surrounding communities for financial support of a new school.

September 26, 2008 9:52 AM

Niki   

Why not? Colleges and hospitals do it all the time. You could name the library or corridors, gym or classrooms for the people who donate money to it.

September 26, 2008 1:26 PM

GTT   

I think that if the board would actually be willing to try this option and actually have some success in raising funds to help offset the cost,

they may see more support for a new school. They have to realize though that a few thousand dollars would not make a whole lot of difference in the big picture, and opinions probably wouldn't change. it would need to be substantually more.

September 26, 2008 2:33 PM

Recalcitrant   

I have often thought that it's really funny a national leader in Outdoors Sporting Goods sales would build a flagship outlet store in a community without the ability to give the children (and adults) in that community any swimming lessons.  It seems to me that if you know how to swim, you're less likely to drown when you're out on a lake, fishing.  And, I think Wisconsin has a lot of lakes and rivers where that store's sporting goods would probably get used.

It doesn't seem unreasonable to ask that store to return the gift of $4,000,000 of taxpayer dollars they received from the county in the form of a Community Swimming Pool with their name on it.  But then again, maybe that store is unappreciative by nature.

As far as leasing a school back:  the lease payment would be taken from the "regular" school funding, and a lot of instruction would have to be cut in order to make that payment.  The option would be to have a referendum vote to make that payment above and beyond the regular tax levy amount.  It seems to me that puts us right back to the same place.  Plus the lease payment would reduce the amount of state aid, in and of itself, versus the "debt retirement" route which in and of itself doesn't enter into the state aid calculation at all.

Charter schools are still public schools, they are just "specialized", so I don't see where there's any point to them in the context presented.  And "Internet Schools", while taking "student count pressure" off of of the buildings, also takes "student count benefit" out of the state aid calculation, which drives up taxes.

Of the 100 largest school districts in Wisconsin, Germantown is seventh from the top (read: 7th WORST!) when it comes to dependency on local taxes to fund the operations.  Energy should be spent on finding out what needs to be done differently, so that we can stop giving back the state funding we are entitled to.  Instead of funding 2/3 ourselves, we should be doing the things that make it 50-50 or better.

By the way:  am I the only one who has noticed that the $900,000 shortfall that the Village is looking to make up, is practically equal to the interest payment on the 10 year old, nearly vacant industrial park.  People seem to keep forgetting that the Village has a massive debt for that albatross.  They also seem to forget that almost every single industrial property (with the exception of Gehl's properties and Stone Container) pays ZERO DOLLARS in village or school tax?  And don't blame anyone other than Kepimpski and Company for that one!

September 26, 2008 3:28 PM

GTT   

Ummm, whay are we talking about a swimming pool?????

September 26, 2008 4:03 PM

taxedtothemax   

Maybe they want to see it voted down for a 4th time?

September 26, 2008 4:42 PM

taxedtothemax   

Excellent Column!

I didn't see any of these alternatives explored by our illustrious school board for a school (and I like your idea on the other village services as well!)

We should have Al as Village President!

September 26, 2008 4:44 PM

GTownie   

I agree -- excellent column, Al.  While Recalcitrant can pick apart the specifics of the examples you gave, I think the overall point is that creative thinking is needed to resolve all of our community issues.  The quick conclusion that our space problem should be resolved by slapping a 5th small, landlocked elementary school just like the other 4 we already have on the only piece of land we already own (whether that site makes sense or not) is incredibly short sighted.  If we are going to invest millions of dollars, it should be in flexible space that can be easily reconfigured/expanded/put to alternate use.  I believe Menomonee Falls is facing declining enrollment and looking at closing school facilities, so it can happen.

September 27, 2008 7:44 AM

taxedtothemax   

Recalcitrant - I'm going to help you out by giving you some new names for yourself when you post - this will save you a lot of typing. You can just come in and make a one word comment and you'll be covered.

Bucket of cold water

"This will never work"

"We've never done this before"

"This has been tried before"

Roadblock

Status Quo

That's too hard

Tax and Spend

Gimme Gimme Gimme

September 27, 2008 10:47 AM

Irwin Fletcher   

Thanks Al for the column but after reding todays paper we do not have to cut back on anything as the new school is FREE!!! You heard it right, the pro referendum group and Bruce W have said that their new figures state that the school can be built, my taxes will go down, and life will be good. So the school really doesn't cost anything, its FREE!!

Why didn't the school board hire this group before, the FREE school would be built by now and my taxes would be less. I feel like such an idiot for not voting for this as I have overpaid my property taxes for that last three years.

My high school math teacher used to say, "Figures dont lie, but Politicians sometimes figure." How true.

So to the residents of Germantown, LETS SPEND $22M AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE IT WONT COST US A THING, ITS BETTER THAN THE LOTTERY!!!

September 28, 2008 9:00 AM

Concerned parent   

I think raising money and business-sponsorship of a community pool is an excellent idea.

However, the idea of businesses holding a stake in anything public-school related is a mistake. We don't have to look any further than a few miles south to MPS and the business-led model of revamping the former Milwaukee Tech to see how disastrous that can turn out.

Business and education models do not mesh. They have completely different priorities, by definition, in order to succeed. Businesses are in business to provide the highest amount of return to their investors, sometimes at the expense of their customers and employees. Schools exist to provide the highest amount of return to their students, not to make money. While on the surface, it may appear that business X may have donated $Y for a new school or library or gym and want nothing in return save their name on a plaque. But the possibility would always be there that they would want/expect preferential treatment or patronage from the community. And when it comes to children and education, there's no place for that.

September 28, 2008 2:03 PM

GTT   

Concerned,

I never once said that the new school should be a business led model schoool. Nor did I suggest or imply that the school is there to make money. But thank you for twisting my words. Also I don't think it would be unreasonable for a company that would make a substantial donation to a project like this to hope/want for more patronage from the community. (please notice that I said HOPE/WANT not expect). I know that I patronize buisness's that are active supporters of the community I live in before ones that do not, even if I have to pay more for whatever it is that I am purchasing.

Let me ask you, if this were the only option that were available to get a new school built would you refuse the donation(s)?

September 29, 2008 10:26 AM

Concerned parent   

GTT,

My apologies. My comments actually were not in response to your comments, but to Mr. Campbell's article.

As to your question, my answer is unequivocably, yes. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. We must learn from other district's mistakes. "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat them." (George Santayana)

September 29, 2008 10:41 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.