From the Village Square

THEN SHALL WE KNOW YE.

Joe Mangiamele — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:15:00 GMT

I'd like to wish Senator John McCain good luck in “fixing Washington,” whatever that means.

“Reform” is another term. What kind of reform and where does one start and toward what end? And what about the term change?

Does McCain want to change the Republican Party, how congress and the president function or does he have some architectural changes he wants to impose on Washington, D.C.?

Mussolini changed Italy and Stalin changed Russia. I can't think of any democratic leader who'd want that kind of change. Then what does change in itself mean?

I don't expect any spectacular changes from either candidate nor within either party.

Usually each presidential candidate offers a program. I want to know what the program is expected to be. It is never what is proposed because there are too many others involved in its eventual development.

Besides, there's the program that is presented to get one elected and the actual developments that come after election. That's why we need to go on to the known principles of the party.

The candidates should tell us, how they intend to fulfill the principles of their parties. That's what we want to know, not the so-called “qualifications” of one or the other presidential candidate.

Once the major parties nominate their presidential candidates, they are both “qualified,” ready or not. And when one of them is elected, he becomes the President of the United States. The loser is disqualified. That's when we learn whose qualified. It certainly should not be a beauty contest.

For now, let's see what the programs are going to be. Then shall we know ye.

IMPERFECT PRESIDENTS

Joe Mangiamele — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:55:00 GMT

It is becoming obvious that political conventions have lost their real usefulness.

They are no longer about party and national issues but about the candidates whom already have been chosen preceding the conventions. Today these gatherings become the candidates' convention.

The primaries made it apparent that Senator McCain was the Republican candidate for president just as at one point Senator Obama was to became the Democratic candidate. I'm sure that most Republicans knew that they were going to vote for McCain and most Democrats would vote for Obama even before convention time.

We know what the issues are. Each party has spelled them out and those in charge have revealed the issues and accepted them. Now it's merely the job of selling those who may not be sure or who usually do not vote. The rest is money given to the media and to professional advisers.

If the Democrats told a Republican that McCain was the devil himself, that wouldn't stop that voter from voting for McCain. If the Republicans told a Democratic voter that Obama was Josef Stalin incarnate, that voter would vote for his party candidate Obama regardless.

All the “conventionering” means little, as do the polls. If your inclinations are on the right, you'll vote Republican, if they are on the left, you'll vote Democratic.

We could probably sum up the issues between the two parties in this manner-- --

economically, the Republicans would leave the market place to deal with all business matters and socially let the church handle all family and sexual matters, approaching all issues from the right;

on the other hand the Democratic party believes that business is a social matter that requires some government intervention in the interest of those who can not make it on their own in society, family matters included, while approaching all issues from the left. And that's it.

We then vote for one party or the other and we should stop trying to make “Gods” out of the candidates. They should be representing public interest through the application of their philosophical principles.

The dominating party can bring the other closer to center when there is some agreement in Congress. An evenly divided government or one with a thin majority does not function well, And whomever is elected president under these conditions is likely to get the country into trouble, primarily because of the loss of energy that a leader of a majority party derives from that majority.

It is the congressional majority and a president of the same party that gives our form of government the liberty to function best. Political conventions spend too much time on the glories of imperfect people who are to become our imperfect presidents.

WHERE DO POLITICIANS STAND?

Joe Mangiamele — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:39:00 GMT

Political parties attract people of similar views and political interests. Party makes a difference. Our current political conventions prove that.

I had three brothers whom I loved dearly. We were split equally, two Republicans and two Democrats. We kept up with most political issues because we held strong opinions and had to defend our beliefs. No holds barred.

We learned that people could think differently about many things of common interest and yet be friends. Many of us know of spouses who love each other and raise families while holding different political beliefs. I know couples of different religions who are happily married.

This brings me to the point that I'd like to bring up. Shorewood has 7 members on its Village Board who usually do not have to reveal their party affiliations. Recently Guy Johnson announced that he is running for State representative from our district as a Democrat.

It would seem that at the local level if citizens knew the party inclinations of the officials that we'd know more about the candidate and how he or she was likely to vote and represent us.

At a small gathering recently several persons expressed surprise that Guy Johnson, president of the Shorewood Village Board was a Democrat--one didn't believe the source nor the information.

I think that political party is important and that citizens running for public office should reveal their party affiliations when they announce as candidates.

Now that the president of the Village Board is a known Democrat, let's hear from the others so that we may know where they stand. After all, they presumably represent us.

WITHOUT BEGINNING OR END.

Joe Mangiamele — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:34:00 GMT

I've heard some elderly say that they live day-by-day.

What does this mean?

“Well, we don't know how much time we have left, how many days, months or years.”

It seems that this shows a diminishing sense of future and with it a decline in the reality of purpose.

Is there purpose to life when one thinks of only living a day at a time?

How do we plan for just one day? We can't plan the care of a garden for just one day.

Do we need to develop a culture where the elderly feel that they belong and belong within a social system, where they are participating in an on-going process similar to that of children in school, where they are involved with utlimate goals?

Perhaps all age groups need such a culture?

Although older adults see their past in some of the youth who occasionally come into their lives, younger people see little or no significance or personalized future that they can identify with as they encounter seniors. Perhaps this is reflected in the casual relationships of today's society.

Many young people engage in a seeming kindness as they come in contact with older people, while some do not. Is there any recognition of the elderly person's psychological condition? How does their diminishing sense of future affect their psyche.

I've heard mature people of lessor age refer to their maturing stage of life as they seem to sense it. But is this in the same way?

The mature have the knowledge that they can still plan for a significant time span ahead. Aren't they only commenting on their recognition of the their lost feeling of youthfulness? For they still hold a sense of future.

Youth is only one stage of life. If we live long enough, we reach a realized finale—the last stage.

This feeling depends on the individual. But I've seen a loss of luster in many of the elderly with whom I've talked with—a day-to-day type of thinking.

What is needed? The invention of a “social continuum process”—a sort of on-going process that provides a strong sense of future and belonging.

Is this done by the mere participation of all individuals and where they can become part of something that seems to have no beginning and no end? Can we really invent cultural elements and add them on to the rest?

(A note to myself--can we consciously modify culture)?

WHAT IS THE “SURVIVAL COEFFIECENT?”

Joe Mangiamele — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:41:00 GMT

Communities of the past embodied an economic “survival coefficient.”

That meant that most of the people who lived in the community worked there, making their own products and making a living there. Their lives and survival were dependent on the community.

Populations were more or less stationary with little or no migration on the part of its members.

Most suburbs today are not survival organs but more or less appendages of the city. People who live there are residents for the time they reside there. They usually are not born in the community where they live as adults nor are their incomes derived from within the community where they live.

In today's highly individualized society there is less dependency of neighbor on neighbor. The physical shelter is no longer a mere shelter. It is an economic element with changing market value and some suburbs have relatively short term occupancy with frequent turnover of ownership.

The suburb might be compared to a hotel that provides living quarters and services for a short period of the time, obviously on a longer term basis than a hotel, until it is time to “move on.”

“Moving on” has been a significant factor of today's suburb. Therefore the more permanent settlement-type community, when found at all today, is more likely to be in the small rural town. Community does not exist as an element or component of suburban living. .

Older adults whose family members may be dispersed over many places are now the first to understand that the dependency of neighbor on neighbor is difficult to maintain in our present mobile society.

And the older adults require this informal association as much school children do, although the school serves somewhat as a social community for children.

The digital age relying on electronic communication further separates individual from individual. E-mail replaces talking over the garden fence and a certain personal interaction is lost.

The various generations become more separated. As these human characteristics experienced in the past are lesser known they are not missed by the younger generations. Their absence however deprives older adults of the fuller lives experienced by previous generations.

Community has more meaning for those of age and who become more dependent on the nearness of others and they are the ones who are more likely to miss community.

Assisted living facilities and services are more like hotels and hospitals than neighborhoods past. More and more older adults prefer living in place, even though neighbors do not provide the social function they once did.

Therefore it is the mature and older adult today who seeks a reconstitution of former community-type living.

Shorewood is fortunate to have the assistance of a group, “Connecting Caring Communities Partnership” which is working toward organizing and implementing those elements of community required by today's elderly.

Its citizens shall be hearing more and more about the activities of this group as it works toward providing for today's elements of the “survival coefficient” for a significant group, the older adults of Shorewood..

WAR AND A DEVELOPING WISDOM.

Joe Mangiamele — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:06:00 GMT

Our foreign policies over the past 20 years have got us into a right mess.

What are we doing in Afghanistan and Iraq? What has our presence there got to do with us here at home? Seven years of talk justifying the war, wasted life and treasure.

Now stretched so thin that the Russian tyrants are testing us in Georgia, again in expansion mode of past Russian Czars and now in that of their modern heirs.

Senator McCain has his opportunity now for a hundred years of war. War seems to be his favorite subject. Only he'll not be here for 100 years.

Putin's soul is not what it appeared to President Bush nor is “winning” the war in Iraq what it appears to be in the eyes of Senator McCain.

We are not too popular in the Muslim world and now it seems also among Russian leaders. Even Gorbachev has spoken out against us. Perhaps now China can become a close ally. Can that be true?

Even Senator Obama is moving closer to Senator McCain's policies to improve his status in the polls.

Obviously, McCain's experience is one of the reasons for not voting for McCain.

Which leaves Obama. My advice to him, for what it is worth is to develop a foreign policy that will lead us out of this mess, this war that he has been opposed to from the beginning.

Neither McCain nor Obama have experience as presidents but Bush and Bill Clinton do. Their experience seems to have moved us into this mess. I don't believe that all Republicans think that McCain's the guy to lead us.

Not all Democrats are without doubt about Obama's ability to do it.

But we need a change in direction. Let us pray that Obama can, like another from Illinois, like Lincoln another unexperienced president carry us with wisdom through a great national and international crisis.

The promise of what America is and is to become in the 21^st century is in the hands of our next president.

Let's hope that he has the developing wisdom of Lincoln in our presently developing crisis.

WHAT DOES GOING GLOBAL MEAN TODAY?

Joe Mangiamele — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:38:00 GMT

Does it mean for Americans that we shall for decades be dependent on foreign oil to the future death of our free market and capitalist economy?

In a non-idealist world do we really express our golbial idealisms by being at war in places like Afghanistan and Iraq? Will Tibet be next, or will it be Iran?

Do we become the providers of mercenary services to the various countries of the world? What's our end of the deal when we fight? Soldiers of fortune get paid.

What's our role with Russia? Does our idealism in their conflict with Georgia involve activating our nuclear weapons?

We need to stop looking into the eyes of dictators. They have no souls. And saying that they do have souls does not change that reality.

The notion of global economy is not working too well for us. We can now see the evidence of a neglected view of its impact and how that has begun to back fire.

The veto power of each member of the big five, seemed O.K. for the United Nations toward the end of World War II. Now is the time to review and eliminate that power and outlaw nuclear weapons as well. This is going to take some good thinking.

Now is the time to unite the United Nations behind the idealism that we present and what it means to the rest of the world.

To do that we must stop functioning as mercenaries and lead the United Nations into what it was meant to be—keepers of the peace and nations together in the interest of humanity.

The Russian government does not show any interest in humanity so what are its real interest in the United Nations? Veto power?

Any nation that does not show interest in individuals and its people and the people of the world is functioning against the desired interests of the United Nation and the good of humanity.

American businessmen in China don't seem to be functioning in the interest of peoples of the world. Their involvement in pollution is not in the interest of our people and our economy.

There is nothing sacred about the United Nations nor in the concept of the global economy. These are concepts that in their practicality are presently found wanting.

People of the world look to the greatness of American idealism. It is that moral energy that gives us the most power. We must continue to maintain that power, that idealism. We saw evidence of that when Obama was in Germany recently.

Expediency takes us into a world of despotism. Putin is a despot. Why can't his dark cynical narcissism be seen by the politicians of the world. He is far from being an idealist. We don't have to look into his eyes for that. But neither should we neglect watching what he's doing. He's going to become a growing problem.

Our idealism must be used for turning the United Nations into an organization for humanity.

The UN must stand against war and despotic governments. It must be made to function as a meaningful force for peace and human good. That is one of our main global responsibilities.

Of course, these are ideals, so was a democratic America. Ideals are more powerful than war and must be turned into practicalities.

If the so-called “global economy” does not work toward these ideals, then let's stop giving lip service to it. If it does not work in the interest of the Chinese people, the Russian people and in the interest of the whole world, including Americans, let's say no to it.

Our human ideals are more important than any economist's theories of global economy. But our ideals have not been best expressed by getting involved in almost every war since WWII.

We must find ways for the implementation of our ideals just as we found the way for becoming the “land of the free”. No ideal like that was every implemented before in the history of the world..

Is the concept of global economy just another economic gimmick for keeping the universally wealthy unified in remaining and in becoming more wealthy?

We must keep our minds clear by thinking of what is in the interest of humanity. And I'm sure we can spell that out.

But we must also learn to understand the cultures of other nations, of their people and how we can accommodate each other's interests.

Let's examine what it is that globalism holds in common for most people of the world. Is it a limited view? Let's take a new perspective. Let's guide its forces toward the good of humanity.

AUGUST AIN'T SO BAD AFTER ALL.

Joe Mangiamele — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:09:22 GMT

AUGUST AIN'T SO BAD AFTER ALL.

But the early morning vapors rise from the surfaces of our lakes here in Wisconsin.

A seasonal occurrence—cooler nights and cooler early mornings, the first signs of colder seasons to come.

A short autumn approaches. And then winter and snow, from my stand point, the coldest and longest season, but still some months away.

Then Spring! That's some jump. Let's keep wishing.

We seem to have over 4 months of winter, at least it seems that long to me, depending on when it starts in my mind and on when we begin preparing for it.

Then less than 8 months to be shared by Spring, Summer and Autumn. Not fair.

Hold on. It's still August. Let's keep in mind that August is still a part of the summer. August is perhaps Wisconsin's best offering. Stop thinking winter.

Those of us, temperature-sensitive creatures must pay homage to this month.

But in reality, September is just around the corner, what will it bring besides some primary elections and school opening? Snow is not likely, not much history of that.

But September brings us another month closer. Wouldn't it be nice if June followed August. I shouldn't wish too hard, that's what global warming might do.

Well, I guess, winter ain't so bad after all. A fire in the fireplace gives good reason for that investment and for warming the spirit.

O.K., O.K., I know, fires pollute. But how much does that contribute to pollution compared to fires in California? How does it compare to fast boats racing across our lakes and then the hauling of these boats back home on the highways and then of course, there's China.

Should I feel guilty about the fire place when billions of dollars in profit, free market activity, come from burning that stuff on the roads.

Should I be talking against the sacred spirit of the “free market” or should I instead continue using my fireplace in support of free market liberty, especially when the snow is coming down?

How about drilling and the drillers? Drill here and drill there and I guess we'll actually drill ourselves vertically or at an angle straight to hell.

This broader stuff needs the attention of the biggies. What should I, this little guy in Wisconsin do about this love of fire in the fireplace? Is it my ticket to hell?

What about my gasoline driven snowblower? It does have an electric starter, unfortunately dependent on coal. And yes, what about coal? Now that I think of it, it seems August ain't so bad after all.

WHAT? EXTENDING THE PAST INTO THE FUTURE?

Joe Mangiamele — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:54:00 GMT

Communities do not plan for their development in the same manner as an architect or an engineer can design a building or a bridge.

The element of design is lacking and without a designer we do not have an end image or an end product. Only the designer can produce these products.

This is one of reasons why one of the first steps taken by those involved in the development of community will seek out a landscape plan for streets and sidewalks or the layout for an industrial park or other elements that can be designed.

Like buildings, these can be designed and developed according to the design plan. Planning goes on with or without these designed elements.

This of course, is one of the main reasons why the term “planning” rather than designing is applied to what might give a type of order to development. It is the process and not a design in itself that is emphasized.

The community planning process depends on the day-to-day workings of the market, the would-be developers, the actions of politicians and on the administrators involved.

The end document, often referred to as the “master plan” appears to give a fixed order to the process and therefore gains a sort of predictive reverence.

A community plan first of all lacks a designer, therefore becomes a nebulous document to begin with. It is subject to interpretation by various people over a period of time. Therefore it is not functioning as an approach to a design, often not the discharging process of the design and even of the ultimate goals or objectives.

My experience with the development of “new towns” around London in England was one where urban designers brought both the planning and development of these towns closest to the discharge of a design.

Therefore, what is lacking in community and urban planning especially in this country is that essential element of urban design and the designer who guides and fulfills the intention of the design.

The element of design in Europe is indicated in the name of the profession, "architect/planner."

Those involved in this process in communities like Shorewood, cannot possibly be involved in this design process of community but only in the on-going planning procedures.

This when closely examined is a process of taking what we know of the past and extending that into the future in the form of document and not design. The document then becomes a legal reference point.

The Glendale shopping mall, whether for good or for bad was designed.

SOLAR ENERGY TREES IN URBAN SETTINGS.

Joe Mangiamele — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:40:00 GMT

The center of small rural communities obviously lack the qualities found in urban suburbs.

On the other hand, suburban communities lack the elements of the centers of cities.

Viewed from a simplest vantage point, we could say that we are speaking of a kind of human intensity both in presence and activity. However, there are some less obvious physical elements that contribute to centers of cities that could be brought to suburbs to add to the quality of centrality.

Old western communities had second story facades to give a perception of height where a second story didn't exist. The distance between both sides of the street in large cities seems to diminish in relation to the excessive height of buildings.

My studies reveal that those suburbs that give a sense of height and lessen the feeling of distance between the two sides of the street also create this sense of urban quality.

One can test this by observing the height of buildings in the Glendale shopping center.

Building elements 30 to 35 foot high provide this required sense of height. There are other ways that the sense of height can be provided. This is by appropriately placed 30 t0 35 foot high sculptures.

These elements do not have the practicality that would require community developers to go in search of them and to pay the price of these art pieces that appear not to give a return.

I've started to design what can be referred to as “solar energy trees” of this height that would generate electricity for lighting of the streets of the community centers. They are not only art pieces but serve practical needs.

Some of the energy produced can be used to heat crosswalks to eliminate snow and ice accumulation.

Appropriately located these solar energy trees can accomplish several business district needs.

After working on this idea for several years, I've found that a type of solar tree has been developed in Europe and has already been put on display in Italy, Austria and Germany.

Ten percent of electrical energy in Europe is being used for street lighting and it expected that these trees may eliminate need of conventional energy for that purpose.

These trees could prove their worth and become an attraction to communities like Shorewood, if developed appropriately.

I'm beginning to seek some young people with whom to develop these art pieces and for the purpose of manufacturing of these energy-producing sculptures as a business.

IS FUTURE MERELY A CONCEPT?

Joe Mangiamele — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:55:00 GMT

The first one-third of one's expected life span, especially in developed countries is spent in education or the development of oneself for the future.

The future at this period in life seems far away and endless. On the other hand, those who have reached the later stages of this life know that they will be leaving the earth as they reach the far edges at this extended range.

Although the time is relatively short, unlike death-condemned prisoners, older adults do not know their exact departure date.

Once the notion that they are among the oldest segment of the population is accepted, they know that nothing else can be done to remove them from that pool moving toward that drop-off point.

Not many talk or write about the mind set that results in most people as they come to grips with this reality. Some of us will remain in denial, not permitting ourselves to love one another.

Those considering the condition and care of the elderly must also consider the reality that death holds in their thoughts and activities, some people not daring to share their present existence and feelings.

“Future” seems to diminish as a concept and in the importance that it once held, especially on graduating from college. “Time” was in abundance then. “Future” at that stage was an ingrained aspect of human existence.

But imagine living daily, knowing the flame of the candle, once infinite in energy and time has begun to flicker and soon will be going out, especially as decrease in effectiveness is sensed with each day that passes. Where is the future here?

These are not the thoughts of those who would build care homes for the elderly. Their services are in fact designed to ignore these realities even if there was knowledge of individual's realities and if any thought was to be given this element of extended living. What is extended living?

Who is to engage this mentality, not always found on the surface?

One as a historian and futurist, living life on a long unending line that makes up both past and future, sees living somewhere on that line that has no beginning and no end.

In that state of mind one need not bother with beginning and it easy not often to think of an end.

Yet there is some acknowledgment that “end” sometimes hovers there in thought like the clouds of an ensuing rain. What is the significance of a future with emphasis on the end?

IS THERE A BETTER PLAN?

Joe Mangiamele — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:35:00 GMT

I believe that the number one issue in Shorewood, although partially invisible at the present time is what to do about our school facilities during declining school enrollment.

What would the closing of one school building in Shorewood do to the appearance of a prosperous suburb that we want to present?

The problem of surplus and even aging school facilities cannot be solved by the school board alone. It requires both school and village boards to devise the means for making the best use of these facilities.

This problem must also be addressed by those who would be our representatives in the State legislature as they run for office this year.

Voting senior citizens could become part of the solution, if these facilities were also to be used for the needs of older adults of the community as well.

Programs for bringing the generations together and for serving seniors as well as children in the development of real community need to be devised by the State but with the help of the local community.

We need to instruct candidates who would represent us as to our needs and provide them proposed solutions. Now is the time to do that.

These are my proposals for working out solutions to some of Shorewood's social problems. I would propose as well, the establishment of a commission to determine the proper and common use of our community physical facilities.

Do members of the School Board and the Village Board have a better plan?

IF THEY WANT TO GET ELECTED.

Joe Mangiamele — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:27:00 GMT

Most seniors as they grow older prefer to stay in place and continue to live in their homes as long as they can.

My conversations with older adults in Shorewood and in the north lake shore communities, indicate that seniors rather move if they'd have to, to an apartment or a group home. This before extended care living. In most cases, they seem to prefer group homes.

Seniors would also want to be involved in intergenerational activities, more family-like life as possible. In this case the school systems have a lot to contribute.

The legislature has a lot to contribute along these lines as well. If the school systems were to receive the same type of benefit for each senior as they do for each child in school this would go a long way toward establishing significant programs for intergenerational care and interaction.

Seniors are already paying school taxes for which they receive no benefits, which doesn't seem an equitable situation. What is needed is a long range plan.

The time is right. Many schools have much room to rattle around in because of the low birth rate. At the same time we have an aging population requiring facilities.

A relatively large number of candidates are running for Dr. Wasserman's seat in the legislature representing the North Shore area and they should take this aging population situation into consideration.

The vote for each candidate therefore will be rather thin so that a block of senior votes would be quite meaningful in this race.

It is in the candidates' interest to propose these type of programs for seniors and that they support these kinds of programs to get the seniors' votes.

I would strongly suggest that candidates educate themselves as to these needs and show support for what seniors want, if they want to get elected.

Shorewood, what about it?

Joe Mangiamele — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:36:29 GMT

Shorewood has a redevelopment program for remodeling duplexes already underway.

I'm therefore proposing that two or three of these buildings, closely located if possible, to be remodeled as “group homes” for seniors.

Here small groups of seniors can be provided individual and group facilities and even place for a live-in aid.

These group homes can then be purchased by individuals who would form the group, in the same manner and with similar legal agreements that buyers of condos become involved in these type purchases.

Here is a place where the Village government can take the lead and where present personnel and procecesses can immediately engage in providing for senior needs in our community.

We can combine this particular element of the redevelopment program with the need that seniors have for group homes.

Let's run with the ball, what about it? Don't seniors deserve a response to this proposal?

IT'S NOT IN THE FIREWORKS.

Joe Mangiamele — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:06:00 GMT

When American soldiers were hitting Omaha beach, named after my home town, a name taken from a tribe of native Americans, thousands of us were in the Manchester area, fairly north in England in a continuous process of reconditioning and of upgrading hundreds and hundreds of aircraft engines, a process that didn't end until the day of the ending of the war itself.

These were my thoughts, stimulated by the display and shooting of fireworks over Independence Day this past weekend. Love of country and patriotism were talked about by politicians this weekend as well. I don't have any thoughts of soldiers talking about patriotism nor as to whether the term would have better equipped us for the war at hand.

It was personal effort that undergirded that collective linkage of those behind the lines and that connected us to those who were facing death moment to moment. It was not romantic love of country nor the vagueness of patriotism that dominated our thinking.

It is only when these thoughts no longer exist in the minds of those who once lived at that time that they will be referred to as history, love of country and patriotism. There is a certain emptiness in politicans' words, usually made audible during the 4th along with the noise of fireworks contrasted to the reality of war.

Our love of country comes in the manner in which we link our thoughts to the efforts of the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan and in the care we give them from afar, and as they return, in the manner we help them renew their lives here. The personal attention given them and to each returned body of individuals who once made up part of this country proves our love of country.

Our patriotism is in the manner we give proper attention to their families and to their returning soldiers as they rejoin the country that loves them.

It's not in one day's fireworks, nor in the excuse for a long weekend.

Our patriotism is the way this country cares for its children, its sick and needy, the elderly and those human beings referred to as troops and returning soldiers. This is love of country and the way we display sound patriotism.

The fireworks cost millions. Yet can we afford these displays but not the adequate care of returning soldiers?

WHAT ARE WE ALL ABOUT?

Joe Mangiamele — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:23:45 GMT

Americans are “disinformed” about homelessness in this country.

It has recently been revealed that more than 400 teen-agers are separated from family and without a place to sleep or able to appropriately shelter themselves in the Milwaukee area.

What is this country all about? Sweden keeps track of its homeless people in order to determine the cause of their situation and for the propose of providing long-term remedies for these individuals as well as for immediate accommodation.

In Anerica we don't often know who they are or how many, let alone determine the cause for their homelessness for remedy purposes.

The idea of rugged individualism does not come from any of the religions that I know about. Most religious groups in the U.S. want to intervene and to give care to these unfortunate individuals, especially the children.

If we can't, as a nation, as a culture look after our children and their development, what are we all about? Most Americans are uninformed about serious social problems in our country.

But "disimformation" about social matters is ingrained in our culture of “individualism”. We need a balance to this idea of rugged individualism, especially when it comes to making sure that children in this country, if not abroad are all to be viewed as the children of God and so treated.

Patriotism and the presidency.

Joe Mangiamele — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:21:01 GMT

The national political scene seems to be proving the old adage, that things are not always what they appear to be.

Supporters of politicians running for president try to use today's communication media for their proposes of bit by bit developing the image of what their future candidate will look like and how he will conduct himself once he's in office.

Yet no one knows what the future brings in relation to problems to be faced, not even the candidate, especially as to how he will conduct himself and as to which policies will be important to him at the time and which policies will be less significant under the circumstances.

Today's conditions are of course, war with a background of economic recession. War and economics the stuff of government.

Each of the two major candidates through their campaigns are trying to prove that he is the wisest of human beings and the only one to deal with these conditions.

Both use their party as the main political base for this, but as we have two parties rather equally split in numbers but not in distribution, each must win the vote of the majority of his own party and many of those who do not strongly associate themselves with party.

During this election process, there's a tendency to confuse country and government. The party in power seeking to regain power combines country and government as one entity. The one out of power, would prove government to be evil, functioning against the interest of the country.

This is a thesis that requires many more words, but in short the party in power would demonstrate that most of what they have done is good, right and and will be proved to be most wise. The party out of power must prove the opposite and criticize government.

However, in so doing, party representatives place themselves in danger of appearing unpatriotic if not treasonous. War heroes become the center of controversy.

On the one side, heroes are sacred and on the other their accomplishments are to be doubted. There remains a strong tendency for returning heroes, as of old, to become the emperors.

The concept of patriotism confuses those who would have less government, ending up defending government while those who would have government carry out many of their proposed policies finding themselves government's strongest critics.

If General Clark were running against Senator McCain, Clark would have to suggest that the experiences of a prisoner of war, no matter how much we admire McCain, do not surpass the experiences of a general when it comes to heading the government.

Today, this discussion appears to have become significant, with that subject being brought up by General Clark, not a candidate for president.

Things are not what they always appear to be, even less so when discussing presidential politics.

THE VILLAGE POT.

Joe Mangiamele — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:15:00 GMT

Within the last few years, we've gained two new Shorewood Village Board members, both by appointment.

All of our board members are individually and socially intelligent. Once they jump into the pot of Village politics they seem to acquire a coating, like M and M's in a variety of colors but difficult to differentiate. The Board's activities and their manner of voting, is referred to as "consensus."

In Shorewood, it is more than mere majority, consensus is more often than not, unanimous This means that even the chocolate coating is the same color.

Individual board members choose to serve and of course do so individually. Once on the board, these individuals seem to loose the individuality which brought them there. They seem to become more combined than individual in their intelligence.

It seems there is something about the nature and consistency of chocolate and if all were put in the sun in a bunch, they'd all melt altogether. Re-election makes incumbents even more like what they already were as they were already in the pot.

The man-on-street's question or the philosophical one that might be asked applies to our legislature and our congress as well. What causes this strange phenomenon? The scientific answer is, “jumping into the pot of likeness” in the first place.

Can Shorewood's politicians be counted on?

Joe Mangiamele — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:29:56 GMT

Most bloggers are interested in more that one issue, but if my interest were only one, it would be that of society's obligation in developing a morality toward the elderly.

We could start with something that I learned as a child, that we should honor our fathers and our mothers.

Because this expression seems too broad for our society and because the idea of honoring anyone not a star or a billionaire is too much to expect, I've been trying to keep it simple.

An indoor or outdoor coffee patio or both where seniors could hang out has been my fundamental and simple issue, a simple code for honoring father and mother. This is not too hard to understand.

Now that one of the leading opponents to this idea has removed himself from the Shorewood Village Board and has been replaced, we might again put some energy into this and if nothing else find who are for and against the idea.

Just as our schools are great places for recreation and sports as well as education, today we find that these facilities have plenty of room and room for senior coffee shops in which seniors can “hang out.”

This we must include in our intergenerational programs. Why not some effort in this direction by the two Boards? Most societies try to “honor their fathers and their mothers,” why don't we?

Ingrained within the Japanese culture, perhaps one of the outstanding ones, is their social feelings for making life as comfortable as possible for the elderly in their society.

Perhaps somewhat difficult to uphold in modern society, the moral is never-the-less there and attention is still called to this social obligation.

Can we in Shorewood call forth such a moral? I think we can. But can the politicians be counted on?

Appointment vs. election by emotion.

Joe Mangiamele — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:42:00 GMT

Now we have a new appointed Trustee at Shorewood Village Hall who won out over eleven others.

Each applicant usually submits a resume and gives other information that is reviewed by all the other trustees. The selection system seems a superior evaluation technique to the actual election process. For often the voters do not have that much information about the candidates and they usually vote by emotion, name association or position on the ballot or have no other choice.

As I mentioned in a previous posting, appointment seems to be a way of providing for superior types on the Board. According to this reasoning then the two appointed members here in Shorewood are superior to the other five, especially to those who ran without opposition, except for one who originally gained her seat by appointment first of all. It seems that appointment is a better test than running without opposition.

What a state of affairs, trustees selecting other trustees superior to themselves. I think I suggested a systematic type of resignation that would bring more members to the Board by appointment rather than by election. We could even have all seven members serving by appointment rather than gaining seats by election. What an elite system.

Perhaps we should select the president of the United States by establishing an elite group to evaluate candidates and then appointing a president. Wouldn't it be superior to the present system of party nomination, then selecting the one least likely to make too many wrong decisions, but more often than not, election by emotion.

We didn't seem to do too well at several of our last presidential elections, nominations made first of all by the two parties and then actually taking office through our election system, which in some cases left some doubt as to whom was really elected. Appointment seems a more positive option and we should celebrate it here in Shorewood and work toward its more extensive utilization.

This all proves that being too logical doesn't always make sense. Democracy can really function without elections. We don't always know to what degree democratic elections really are democratic or how good they are. Appointments are not as biased as party selections and appointments may beat election by emotion.