|
By Janet Evans
Friday, Sep 5 2008, 10:16 PM
 We’ve had some tough presidents…and one, well, Jimmy Carter….
Who were the 5 most badass presidents of all-time?
I'm sure you have your choices…
from Cracked.com...
"As we all prepare to spend a long weekend enjoying Presidential Savings on mattresses and used Toyotas, we could take time to thank some of the presidents who passed bills that protect some of the freedoms your enjoy daily. Or we could spend the day celebrating the presidents who are decidedly more Action Movie Heroes than diplomats. Anyway, guess which kind of president this website decided to focus on? "
View their "badass" five-page presentation
HERE
|
By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Sep 2 2008, 06:40 AM
I love space!
Who doesn’t love looking at the stars on a clear night?
You have heard NASA is celebrating its 50th Anniversary, haven’t you?
You’ve just got to check out this cool animated tour of NASA from the 50s through the future.
Make sure you move your cursor over EVERYTHING!
The site’s out of this world!
Give yourself some time though.
There’s 50 years of interesting history to see!
So
10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01
Blast off!
Click on the image to go to NASA...and once you are there...click anywhere on the main page.

|
By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Aug 26 2008, 08:58 PM
1978: John Paul I elected new Pope
Cardinal Albino Luciani was elected by the papal conclave to the papacy today. Luciani became the first Pope to choose a double name, that of John Paul I. “They are the names of his two immediate predecessors, Paul VI and John XXIII, and were taken by the 65-year-old Luciani after his election by the 111 cardinals voting in a secret conclave in the Sistine Chapel. His choice indicated he plans to follow in the footsteps of Paul and John and their reform policies,” explained the Syracuse Herald Journal on August 27, 1978.
The new Pope’s reign was cut short however. “Pope John Paul I was found dead of an apparent heart attack in his Vatican apartment today, leaving the throne of St. Peter vacant for the second time in less than five weeks,” informed The Chronicle Telegram on September 29, 1978, “The end of his 34-day reign—the briefest in four centuries—stunned his 700 million Roman Catholic followers, still grieving the death of Pope Paul VI on August 6.
”NOTE: During his brief stint as Pope, John Paul I was known for his gentle demeanor and kindness. He was succeeded by Karol Józef Wojtyla, or John Paul II, on October 16, 1978.

| Papacy began |
August 26, 1978 |
| Papacy ended |
September 28, 1978 |
| Predecessor |
Paul VI |
| Successor |
John Paul II |
John Paul I New Pope.pdf
Tidings of Great Joy.pdf
Heart Attack Kills Pope John Paul.pdf
AND
1920: Women gain right to vote
With the passing of the 19th amendment through Congress today, women gain the right to vote. “Today is a red-letter day for the woman suffrage advocates of this country, for it marks the fulfillment of their long cherished hope for the full enfranchisement of all qualified women as voters,” informed The Daily Northwestern on August 26, 1920.
NOTE: Tennessee was the 36th state to ratify the amendment on August 18, securing the required number to pass the bill into law.
Suffrage Ratification proclaimed.pdf
*****************
I found the last paragraph of the news article of much interest:
“The opponents of woman suffrage seem to be bad losers. Even after they have been beaten, they insist on keeping up a fight to delay the women from votingas long as possible.”
|
By Janet Evans
Monday, Aug 25 2008, 06:40 AM
I knew the South was more interested in glorifying war than fighting it to win. And I knew the North was far superior in leadership and just plain common sense.
I've lived in New England and in the Deep South. I had a teacher who kept a Confederate flag hung front and center in his school office when I was in high school.
I think the Civil War is a unique study...and while we think there were only two sides to the conflict, it was really filled with many layers of controversy.
I mage: AJC.com
"Generations of students have been taught that the South lost the Civil War because of the North’s superior industry and population. A new book suggests another reason: Southerners were largely responsible for defeating the Confederacy.
In “Bitterly Divided: The South’s Inner Civil War, historian David Williams of Valdosta State University lays out some tradition-upsetting arguments that might make the granite brow of Jefferson Davis crack on Stone Mountain.
“With this book,” wrote Publishers Weekly, “the history of the Civil War will never be the same again.”
Actually, historians have long fallen into two camps in explaining the Confederacy’s demise — one stressing the Union’s advantages, the other the South’s divisions. Williams gives vivid expression to the latter view, drawing on state and local studies done primarily in the past two decades."
Read William's interview HERE
|
By Janet Evans
Friday, Aug 22 2008, 06:28 AM

Mona Lisa (Italian: La Gioconda, French:La Joconde) |
Leonardo da Vinci, c. 1503–1506 | 1911: The Mona Lisa is stolen The Mona Lisa, the famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci, was stolen today from the Louvre. No one noticed that the painting was gone until the following day; even then, guards just assumed the painting was being photographed.
"The famous painting hung in the place of honor in the Salon Carre, and not a vestige of a clue was left by the person or persons who took it to aid the detectives and police in trying to trace it.
A search of every nook and cranny of the Louvre, from roof to cellar, only brought to light the valuable frame in which the picture hung and the glass that covered it. These were intact on a back staircase," reported The Washington Post on August 23, 1911.
"Some persons there are who believe that a practical joke has been played, but, nevertheless, the government has set to work its entire force of detectives in an effort to recover the painting.
"NOTE: The painting was finally recovered over two years later. A Louvre employee, Vincenzo Peruggia, stole the painting by hiding in a broom closet until the museum closed and then simply walking out with it hidden underneath his coat. According to the Reno Evening Gazette, Peruggia stole the painting "as an act of patriotic vengeance for Napoleon's depredations in Italy."
Great Picture Stolen Today:
Mona Lisa, of Di Vinci Taken From the Louvre
Fort Wayne News - August 22, 1911.pdf
(actual newspaper article)
|
By Janet Evans
Thursday, Aug 14 2008, 11:45 AM
1945: Japan Surrenders
Japan accepted terms for surrender to the Allied Forces today, though Washington officials had not received the official confirmation. "NBC Correspondent Max Jordan reported from Basle, Switzerland, today that a Japanese note will be at the White House in Washington 'within two hours.' Jordan broadcast the report at 4:20 p.m., eastern war time," informed The Sheboygan Press on August 14, 1945.
”A rising tide of joy is sweeping from the Pacific across the United States today,” reported the Sheboygan Journal on August 14, 1945. “Pearl Harbor – scene of the first Japanese attack – set the stage for the celebrations. The tension pent up since December 7, 1941, was let loose as soon as Tokyo broadcast the enemy surrender.”
NOTE: Four hours after President Truman addressed Americans, Emperor Hirohito said in the first broadcast he ever made over the Japanese Broadcasting Corporation network that the atomic bomb forced Japan to accept the first military defeat in the 2,605 years of its history.
Sheboygan Press Newspaper frontpage~ Japan Surrenders.pdf
(actual frontpage - may be offensive)
|
By Janet Evans
Saturday, Aug 2 2008, 10:30 PM
Truly a wonderful thing. We really are fortunate to have DNA forensics. What would we have done after September 11th if not for DNA forensics? Tragically, many of the victims of the attack only had bone and tissue left. For the families, this was the only way to identify their loved ones.
Criminals don’t like DNA forensics. Although some criminals have been proven innocent due to this science.
The government has a mission. It is to find and identify soldiers from past wars.
MIAs…
Read the opening and then continue this interesting story from the Boston Globe
Army Major George Eyster didn't know - couldn't know - the two young men whose fighter planes disappeared into the jungle 64 years ago. But Eyster, a 32-year-old combat veteran of the Iraq war, feels like he does.
Gazing down over a sparkling harbor toward the caves where Japanese forces once hid from relentless American bombing, he thinks about the costs of war, then and now.
Eyster flew a helicopter gunship in Iraq, hovering only 50 feet above the charred battlegrounds of the Sunni Triangle and trying to take out enemy insurgents before they could kill American troops. Sometimes he succeeded. Sometimes he didn't.
Now, as a rumbling volcano spews ash in the distance, he stands on the killing fields of another war, where an earlier generation of young Americans sat in the terrifying loneliness of their cockpits, trying to take out enemy fighters defending the main Japanese base in the South Pacific.
Eyster, who traded in his military uniform for a polo shirt emblazoned with the signature black and white POW/MIA flag, came to Papua New Guinea to lead a group of soldiers - most of them Iraq and Afghanistan veterans - to try to find the remains of two World War II fliers who were just 19 and 25 when they were lost in 1944.
The expedition is part of the Pentagon's ambitious new initiative to locate tens of thousands of MIAs from World War II, many lost for decades in terrain that was considered unreachable, masked by unforgiving jungles or closed off by hostile regimes.
Armed with new technologies that can extract DNA from mere shards of tooth or bone, the searchers are trying to bring closure to a war that is starting to recede from living memory. For Eyster, the feeling of connection is palpable: The two men his team is endeavoring to find - Marion R. McCown and Allan S. Harrison III - might as well be the pilots he led into battle in Iraq.
"I think to myself, I have been in command of 18- and 19-year-old men - and women, in fact - flying helicopters across Iraq," Eyster says. "One of our aircraft was shot down over Baqubah, and we lost the two pilots in there.
"Both of the World War II pilots, McCown and Harrison, now belong to military history. Neither has any known descendants. No one is waiting at home for the recovery of their remains. Eyster and his fellow soldiers are undertaking this mission for the pilots - and for themselves.
"In our own minds we are doing what we would want to be done for ourselves," Eyster says. "I have seen guys break their backs for the idea that we are going to bring this little shred of evidence back home because he is a comrade-in-arms, he is a buddy."
Continued...
|
By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Jul 29 2008, 11:51 AM
I was at a wedding for the best friend of my daughter back in May. It was a beautiful wedding, up in Green Bay. I was very surprised, though, that the bride chose to recite ultra traditional vows, regarding submitting to her husband.
Today is the anniversary of the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana. Princess Diana chose to buck tradition and not recite totally traditional vows. I’m sure the Royal family wasn’t very happy…but there was a lot they were not happy about with Diana. 1981: Prince Charles and Diana wedDiana Frances Spencer and Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, were married at St. Paul's Cathedral in London today. It was estimated that 500 million people watched the ceremony on television. "After the 80-minute Church of England ceremony, the royal couple rode back to Buckingham Palace in an open carriage, wending through a crowd of almost one million people who roared their good wishes and waved a sea of Union Jack flags. Church bells rang across the realm," reported the Syracuse Herald-Journal on July 29, 1981. "The union of the 32-year-old prince of Wales and Lady Diana, the 20-year-old kindergarten teacher with the captivating smile, was the first time in three centuries the heir to the British throne had married an English-born woman.
"NOTE: Although the occasion was one of the largest royal events in decades, Diana did not agree with all of the usual customs. Before the wedding, she removed the word "obey" from her wedding vows. She also declared that she would not walk one pace behind Charles or refrain from using his first name in public.

|
By Janet Evans
Wednesday, Jul 2 2008, 12:18 PM

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary July 2, 2008
President Bush Discusses 2008 G8 Summit Rose Garden
10:31 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Next week I'm going to travel to Japan for the eighth and final G8 summit of my presidency.
At recent summits, G8 countries have made pledges to help developing nations address challenges, from health care to education, to corruption. Now we need to show the world that the G8 can be accountable for its promises and deliver results. As I said the other day, we need people who not only make promises, but write checks, for the sake of human rights and human dignity, and for the sake of peace.
Accountability is really important when it comes to our work on the continent of Africa. In 2005, G8 leaders promised to double development assistance to Africa by 2010. America is on track to meet our commitments. And in Japan, I'll urge other leaders to fulfill their commitments, as well.
We must also fulfill our commitments in the battle against HIV/AIDS and malaria. I've asked Congress to reauthorize and expand the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, doubling our funding for this vital effort. It's very important that Congress reauthorize this plan, but in the meantime, we're fulfilling our promises that we made, not only to -- at the G8, but more importantly, to the people of -- on the continent of Africa.
It's important that over the next five years that we support antiretroviral treatment for approximately 2.5 million people, that we prevent 12 million new AIDS infections, and that we care for 12 million people also affected by HIV/AIDS -- including 5 million orphans and vulnerable children. Last year, the G8 agreed to meet those commitments; they agreed to match. They also agreed to help us reduce malaria in affected countries by half. And I just -- I hope that these countries understand the great promise and hope that comes when we help alleviate this suffering. And so one of my really important agenda items is going to -- is going to rally our partners to make commitments and meet commitments.
We'll also discuss additional steps to confront some other challenges, such as the need to train health care workers in G8 partner countries in Africa. It's one thing to say we're going to help people with their -- deal with disease, but a lot of these countries need workers that are capable of helping, of reaching out to people in need. We should set a goal to treat at least 75 percent of the people with neglected tropical diseases in the most affected countries. We've got to work to confront higher food prices. I'm confident we'll be talking about energy and food.
On the food issue, I've announced that the United States would make available nearly $1 billion in new resources to bolster global food security. Once again I'll be going to the G8 and talking about the great compassion and concern of the American people in addressing problems.
At Toyako I'll also ask leaders of the G8 to make other important strategic moves to alleviate hunger, such as increasing the shipments of food, fertilizers and seeds to countries in need. It's one thing to talk about the problem; this is a practical way to help countries deal with the lack of food.
We need to help severely affected nations grow more of their own food. It's one thing to provide food; it seems like -- it make sense to me to say, we're going to help you become more agriculturally self-sustaining. This has been a issue in the United States Congress, by the way. Unfortunately, we tried to get this in the farm bill. Our members of Congress decided against this plan, this way forward. But it makes sense for the United States if we're going to be providing food aid to encourage people to grow their own food so we don't have to deal with this problem on a regular basis.
I'm also going to make sure that the world understands the importance of advanced agricultural technologies, including biotechnology, to help nations grow food so they don't have to come to the world for help. We'll also be talking about export restrictions and tariffs and subsidies. We will work to tear down barriers to trade and investment around the world. It's an opportunity for those of us in the G8 and the other nations coming to talk about a successful round of Doha. The United States is firmly committed to Doha. We're working hard to get this done by the end of the year, and it will be a good opportunity in Japan to discuss what we need to do together to open up market access and to reduce agricultural subsidies.
We'll be talking about energy security and, of course, at the same time, the climate change issue. I'll be reminding people that we can have better energy security and we can be better stewards of the environment without sacrificing economic growth.
And the principle is pretty simple. It's going to be hard to have the amount of money necessary to invest in new technologies if we don't have the money to spend, and therefore we need to make sure our economies are vibrant.
We're now implementing new mandatory programs that will reduce billions of tons of emissions. I'll remind people at the G8 and other nations that we're taking effective steps. We're going to make available more than $40 billion in loan-guarantee authority to support private sector incentives and innovative clean energy technologies.
The 2009 budget requests more than $4 billion to support technologies that have the potential to avoid, reduce and sequester greenhouse gases. In other words, we've got a strong agenda when it comes to providing money to encourage the advent of new technologies. And as well, we'll be meeting with leaders of the major economies to discuss shared strategies and practical actions for addressing greenhouse gas emissions. This is called the Major Economies Process that we proposed and G8 leaders endorsed.
All this is aiming, by the way, to develop a strategy in which major economies are a part of the strategy. Look, we can't have an effective agreement unless China and India are a part of it. It's as simple as that. I'm going to remind our partners that's the case. And we want the United Nations Framework Convention to be effective. And so we've got to reach common ground on how to proceed.
And we're making some progress there, including the knowledge that we've got to have a long-term emissions reduction goal, midterm goals with national plans to achieve them, and cooperation in key industrial sectors.
And also we're going to talk about the struggle against violent extremists. The temptation is to kind of say, well, maybe this isn't really a war, maybe this is just a bunch of disgruntled folks that occasionally come and hurt us. You know, that's not the way I feel about it. This is an ongoing, constant struggle to defend our own security, and at the same time, help people realize the blessings of liberty. I'll, of course, talk about Afghanistan and Iraq, and ask the G8 to continue to help.
So this is an historic opportunity to meet, to exchange ideas, and to address some of the problems we all face. And I'm looking forward to going. And now I'll be glad to answer a couple of questions.
Deb.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. June was the deadliest month for U.S. troops in -- since we began the war in Afghanistan. Has Afghanistan replaced Iraq as the central front of the war on terror? And is al Qaeda and the Taliban taking the upper hand? And also, is it possible that we could send additional U.S. troops there sooner than the 2009 date that you've been talking about?
THE PRESIDENT: First of all, anytime a troop loses their life, whether it be in Afghanistan, Iraq, or elsewhere, our hearts go out to their families. And I am so appreciative that, in a time of danger, Americans are willing to step up and volunteer and sacrifice.
Secondly, it has been a tough month in Afghanistan, but it's also been a tough month for the Taliban. You know, one reason why there have been more deaths is because our troops are taking the fight to a tough enemy, an enemy who doesn't like our presence there because they don't like the idea of America denying safe haven. America is pressing an ideology that's opposite of theirs, and so, of course, there's going to be resistance.
I am confident that the strategy is going to work, which is to confront the Taliban, confront elements of al Qaeda, and at the same time, encourage the growth of a free society by good economic policy, good education policy, and good health policy.
We're constantly reviewing troop needs, troop levels. We're halfway through 2008; as I said, we're going to increase troops by 2009. One thing, however, that you got to understand is that we have doubled Afghan troops -- coalition troops have doubled from two years ago. So there is an active presence and there are more troops there than there were. But we're constantly reassessing and seeing whether or not we can change tactics in order to achieve our objective.
Toby.
Q What do you realistically expect to accomplish at the G8 to deal with soaring oil prices and the weak dollar, which are having effects on the U.S. economy? Even the Chinese now are saying that the United States needs to stabilize the dollar.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Well, we're strong-dollar people in this administration and have always been for a strong dollar, and believe that the relative strengths of our economy will reflect that. One thing we need to make clear when I'm with our partners is that we're not going to become protectionists; that we believe in free trade and open markets. One of the fears around the world is the United States becomes a protectionist nation.
Secondly, I'll remind people it took us a while to get into the energy situation we're in and it's going to take us a while to get out of it. But one thing is for certain here in the United States, that we can help alleviate shortages by drilling for oil and gas in our own country -- something I've been advocating ever since I've been the President. I've been reminding our people that we can do so in environmentally friendly ways. And yet, the Congress, the Democratically controlled Congress now has refused to budge. It makes no sense for -- to watch these gasoline prices rise when we know we can help affect the supply of crude oil, which should affect the supply of gasoline prices.
And so, yes, we'll be talking about energy. Ultimately, of course, we're going to transition away from hydrocarbon. But we're now just in a transitional period and we need more oil to be able to do so. And I'm also going to remind people that our habits are changing. You notice in these newspapers that automobile sales have slowed down dramatically as automobile manufacturers shift from cars that are using more gasoline to cars that are more efficient, more fuel efficient.
And I'll also tell them it's a tough period for American consumers. I mean, nobody likes high gasoline prices, and I fully understand why Americans are concerned about gasoline prices. But I want them to understand fully that we have got the opportunity to find more crude oil here at home, in environmentally friendly ways, and they ought to be writing their Congress people about it; and they ought to say, you ought to be opening up ANWR and Outer Continental Shelf, and increasing oil shale exploration, for the sake of our consumers, as well as become less dependent on oil.
McKinnon.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. Can you tell me what is the outlook for getting an agreement with the emerging economies that will limit emissions in a meaningful way in the midterm? What's the outlook for that, and how --
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, well, the first thing, John, is to make sure we get a understanding that all of us need to agree on a long-term goal. And part of the reluctance has been -- on some nations that are major economies -- to participate at all, because initially, I'm confident, they thought they were going to get a free pass from any international agreement. I mean, after all, the Kyoto international agreement excluded major economies. And therefore, they probably think, well, maybe history will repeat itself.
The idea is to say, look, we want to be effective. Effectiveness comes when major economies come to the table. The first step is to agree to a long-term goal. And I've talked to our sherpa about that, and he feels pretty good that people are now coming to the clear understanding that we're going to have to come to a long-term goal. Hopefully we can do it at this meeting. If not, we'll continue to press forward to get it done.
Secondly, one of the -- a lot of the developing world says, well, it's unfair; the developed world gets to develop and we don't. Well, our attitude about that is, why don't we set up a technology fund; make it easier for people to be able to afford the new technologies that nations like ours and others will bring to the marketplace.
Thirdly, if you really do want to make sure technologies move around the world, we got to reduce these trade barriers and tariffs that prohibit technologies from moving like they should.
And so we'll see, John. I mean, this is a tough issue. It's tough to get consensus. People -- there's a consensus that it's a problem, but it's tough to get a consensus that all of us have a responsibility to do something about it -- not just some, but all of us, so that whatever we do is effective.
Bret Baier.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. There have been a spate of recent stories about possible military action against Iran before the end of the year, if not by the U.S. than by Israel. And that prompted Iranian officials to say, if they're attacked they'll essentially shut down the Strait of Hormuz. One, how confident are you that Israel will not act independently as the diplomatic process moves forward? And two, what do you make of the mixed messages out of Iran -- one of defiance and one of willingness to negotiate?
THE PRESIDENT: I have always said that all options are on the table, but the first option for the United States is to solve this problem diplomatically. I've also make it clear -- made it clear that you can't solve a problem diplomatically unless there are other people at the table with you. And that is why we have been pursuing multilateral diplomacy when it comes to convincing the Iranians that the free world is sincere about, you know, insisting that they not have the technologies necessary to develop a nuclear weapon.
And we're making progress along those lines. There's been the numerous Security Council resolutions, and in my recent trip to Europe I was very encouraged to see these leaders stand up and speak out about the need to keep our coalition active and keep the pressure on.
I will talk to Martha Raddatz.
Q Let me follow up on that. Would you strongly discourage Israel from going after Iran militarily? And do you believe when you leave office Iran will be pursuing a nuclear weapon?
THE PRESIDENT: I have made it very clear to all parties that the first option ought to be to solve this problem diplomatically. And the best way to solve it diplomatically is for the United States to work with other nations to send a focused message, and that is, that you will be isolated and you will have economic hardship if you continue trying to enrich.
As you might remember, I worked closely with Vladimir Putin on this issue, when I said that -- when asked at one of these innumerable press conferences, did you -- do you think they ought to have a civilian nuclear program, I said, of course, they should, but they can't be trusted to enrich.
And therefore, I agree with Russia that Russia -- when Russia said she will provide enriched uranium for a civilian nuclear power program and will collect the enriched uranium, thereby negating the need for the Iranian regime to enrich at all.
And so we will continue working diplomatically.
Listen, thank you very much. I've enjoyed being with you. I hope you've enjoyed being with me. You have? Thank you.
END 10:48 A.M. EDT
Audio
|
By Janet Evans
Thursday, Jun 26 2008, 04:15 PM

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary June 26, 2008
Termination of the Exercise of Authorities Under the Trading with the Enemy Act with Enemy Act with Respect to North Korea A Proclamation by the President of the United States of America
I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. App. 5(b) note), hereby find that the continuation of the exercise of authorities under the Trading With the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C. App. 1 et seq.) (TWEA) with respect to North Korea, as authorized in Proclamation 2914 of December 16, 1950, most recently continued under Presidential Determination 2007-32 of September 13, 2007 (72 FR 53407), and implemented by the regulations set forth below, is no longer in the national interest of the United States.
Section 1. The exercise of TWEA authorities with respect to North Korea, which were implemented by the Foreign Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 500, and the Transaction Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 505, and that were continued by Presidential Determination 2007-32 of September 13, 2007, is terminated, and Presidential Determination 2007-32 is rescinded with respect to North Korea.
Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to take all appropriate measures within the Secretary's authority to give effect to this proclamation.
Sec. 3. This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
Sec. 4. This proclamation is effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on June 27, 2008.
WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.
GEORGE W. BUSH
|
By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Jun 24 2008, 09:43 PM
Please do not try to compare yourself to former President Ronald Reagan, who was revered as a giant of conservative Republicanism.
You are an American Hero, and I respect you for your service to our country and for all that you went through, but you are not Ronald Reagan.
"Freedom" -- featuring Ronald Reagan's wisdom, Fred Thompson's narration and John McCain's vision for our future -- lays out the stakes on Election Day and was the feature video for the 2008 President's Dinner.
|
By Janet Evans
Monday, Jun 23 2008, 07:05 AM
 A Basic Abacus
In Asia, the Chinese were becoming very involved in commerce with the Japanese, Indians, and Koreans. Businessmen needed a way to tally accounts and bills. Somehow, out of this need, the abacus was born. The abacus is the first true precursor to the adding machines and computers which would follow. It worked somewhat like this:The value assigned to each pebble (or bead, shell, or stick) is determined not by its shape but by its position: one pebble on a particular line or one bead on a particular wire has the value of 1; two together have the value of 2. A pebble on the next line, however, might have the value of 10, and a pebble on the third line would have the value of 100. Therefore, three properly placed pebbles--two with values of 1 and one with the value of 10--could signify 12, and the addition of a fourth pebble with the value of 100 could signify 112, using a place-value notational system with multiples of 10. Thus, the abacus works on the principle of place-value notation: the location of the bead determines its value. In this way, relatively few beads are required to depict large numbers. The beads are counted, or given numerical values, by shifting them in one direction. The values are erased (freeing the counters for reuse) by shifting the beads in the other direction. An abacus is really a memory aid for the user making mental calculations, as opposed to the true mechanical calculating machines which were still to come.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In 1985, as a stay at home mom, I felt I was very fortunate. My daughter went to school at Country Dale Elementary School, in Franklin. Apple computers were the rage in the Franklin schools. I had never owned or used a computer before, but my daughter, who was in the Gifted and Talented Program (which, if I remember correctly had just been instituted in the school system) was very interested in computers. With me being a volunteer at school, I was also interested, and I wanted a computer at home for both of us to use.
We saved, and we purchased an computer. I also bought the same programs that my daughter was using at school. The cool thing was, the printer was dot matrix. Wow! The best thing, before we started using the internet for everything? Having an encyclopedia program. It was the greatest! Having that computer not only helped my children, but helped me with future employment. Could we have lived without it? Of course. But right now, it’s awfully hard to think of times without computers.
I do think back to my school days without them. We had manual typewriters and we did term papers that didn’t always look very nice, but they were a least typed. Teachers were making copies on actual mimeograph machines that used blue ink. I can still smell that ink, with the papers that were still damp when we got them. Calculators, if you were lucky enough to have one, were huge and clumsy.
There are many things in life that I wouldn’t mind giving up and just going back to the old fashioned way. But a computer is not one of them. Back in 1985 the computer was an amazing adventure for me, even though it was in a basic form. But now, a computer has pretty much opened up the world....Just think where a computer can take you.
Read about the history of computers: Computers From Past to Present ç here
|
By Janet Evans
Sunday, Jun 22 2008, 07:30 PM
Yesterday an article by two Associated Press writers, Alan Fram and Eileen Putman was posted titled,
Everything seemingly is spinning out of control. É
I began reading this article thinking it was going to be some usual lefty spin that would set me off. But I found it to be oh, so much more than that. I found it to be an article of interest to all Americans; no matter what political viewpoint you have. I found it to be of interest to all Americans who have pride in themselves and their country. You see, I find Fram and Putman to have written an article that is on the verge of being un-American.
The can-do, bootstrap approach embedded in the American psyche is under assault. Eroding it is a dour powerlessness that is chipping away at the country's sturdy conviction that destiny can be commanded with sheer courage and perseverance.
[…]
Why the vulnerability? After all, this is the 21st century, not a more primitive past when little in life was assured. Surely people know how to fix problems now. Maybe. And maybe this is what the 21st century will be about — a great unraveling of some things long taken for granted.
Oh, please, Fram and Putman, don’t tell us, the American people, that we have lost the spirit that we have had as American people since the first foot touched soil here. We are a compassionate country and we will come to the aide of each other when we are down. We are a country of democracy, we can vote for whomever we choose. We are always able to improve are lives if we choose to do so…it’s our choice…we still live in the land of opportunity, don’t we? That has not changed.
These authors can only see in front of them and do not really know the people of America. They could not have lived during the Great Depression, or fought during World War I or II. They could not have "Gone West, young man," or traveled here as an immigrant all alone back in the 1800s, or broke their backs working hard as slaves on a plantation in the South.
What do they know about Americans?
They think we have lost our spirit.
They are wrong.
|
By Janet Evans
Sunday, Jun 15 2008, 06:05 AM

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary June 14, 2008
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week I'm traveling in Europe. In the past few days, I have visited Slovenia, Germany, Italy, and the Vatican. I'm spending this Saturday in France. And I will conclude my trip in the United Kingdom.
In my meetings, I've discussed our shared efforts to advance peace and prosperity around the world. America has strong partners in leaders like Italy's Silvio Berlusconi, Germany's Angela Merkel, France's Nicolas Sarkozy, and Britain's Gordon Brown. And together we're pursuing an agenda that is broad and far-reaching.
America and Europe are cooperating to open new opportunities for trade and investment. We're working to tear down regulatory barriers that hurt our businesses and consumers. We're striving to make this the year that the world completes an ambitious Doha trade agreement -- which will open up new markets for American goods and services, and help alleviate poverty around the world.
America and Europe are cooperating to address the twin challenges of energy security and climate change while keeping our economies strong. We're working to diversify our energy supplies by developing and financing new clean energy technologies. And we're working toward an international agreement that commits every major economy to slow, stop, and eventually reverse the growth of greenhouse gases.
America and Europe are cooperating to widen the circle of development and prosperity. We're leading the world in providing food aid, improving education for boys and girls, and fighting disease. Through the historic commitments of the United States and other G8 countries, we're working to turn the tide against HIV/AIDS and malaria in Africa. And to achieve this noble goal, all nations must keep their promises to deliver this urgent aid.
America and Europe are cooperating on our most solemn duty: protecting our citizens. Our nations are applying the tools of intelligence, finance, law enforcement, diplomacy, and -- when necessary -- military power to break up terror networks and deny them safe havens. And to protect against the prospect of ballistic missile attacks emanating from the Middle East, we're developing a shared system of missile defense.
We're also working together to ensure that Iran is not allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. This week, America and our European allies sent a clear and unmistakable message to the regime in Tehran: It must verifiably suspend its enrichment activities -- or face further isolation and additional sanctions. Together, America and Europe are pursuing strong diplomacy with Iran, so that future generations can look back and say that we came together to stop this threat to our people.
In the long run, the most important way we can protect our people is to defeat the terrorists' hateful ideology by spreading the hope of freedom. So America and Europe are working together to advance the vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side-by-side in security and peace. We're working together to protect the sovereignty of Lebanon's young democracy. And we're working together to strengthen the democratically elected governments in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In all of these areas, the United States and Europe have agreed that we must take action -- and that we must go forward together. The level and breadth of the cooperation between America and our European allies today is unprecedented. And together we're making the world a safer and more hopeful place. Thank you for listening.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Father's Day, 2008
A Proclamation by the President of the United States of America
On Father's Day, we honor our Nation's fathers for the unconditional love they give to their children and for their selfless dedication to the well-being of their families.
Fathers play a unique and irreplaceable part in the lives of their children and pass along values that help children grow into responsible adults. By providing their sons and daughters with a positive example, fathers help give their children the necessary foundation they need to make wise decisions throughout their lives. Fathers strive to inspire their children to lead lives of integrity, honor, and purpose, and they pray for wisdom and the strength to give their children the love and support they need to achieve their dreams.
All Americans are thankful for the extraordinary efforts of our Nation's fathers, stepfathers, grandfathers, and guardians. Their devotion and encouragement as mentors, providers, and role models help strengthen their families and our country. We are especially grateful for the fathers who serve in our Nation's Armed Forces. These dedicated fathers protect liberty so that all children can have a more promising future. We pray for the safe return of all those serving overseas, and we thank the fathers who support sons and daughters who are defending our freedom around the globe.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, in accordance with a joint resolution of the Congress approved April 24, 1972, as amended (36 U.S.C. 109), do hereby proclaim June 15, 2008, as Father's Day. I encourage all Americans to express their appreciation to all fathers for their many contributions to our Nation's children. I direct the appropriate officials of the Government to display the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on this day. I also call upon State and local governments and citizens to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.
GEORGE W. BUSH
|
By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Jun 10 2008, 08:28 PM
 George Walker Bush 43rd President of the United States
Well, I always knew he was compassionate.
I could see it in him everyday.
And I was ever so thankful George W. Bush was who he was during this time, and not of the substance of former President Jimmy Carter.
So, President Bush is vocalizing, in his twilight days of his presidency, that he is having regrets about his portrayal of himself….his legacy.
I don’t blame him…for himself anyway. He didn’t start out his presidency expecting to have to lead the country during a war on terrorism.
I know he protected me and my family by many different means. And I realize one of those means was the greatest sacrifice of all, and so does he. And I thank those soldiers and their families....eternally.
I know so many of you will read or hear his words and snicker, and say, too little, too late.
That's your prerogative.
I hope some day you'll be able to look back and see that you were wrong.
But I hope it won't be because of tragic circumstances .
Read the story from Times Online ç here
 Ashley Faulkner, whose mother was murdered on 9-11, receives a hug from President Bush.
|
By Janet Evans
Tuesday, Jun 10 2008, 06:57 AM
Cincinnati Reds' Ken Griffey Jr., waves to the crowd after he hit his 600th home run during the first inning of a baseball game against the Florida Marlins Monday, June 9, 2008 at Dolphin Stadium in Miami. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)
“Griffey's name never has appeared on a police blotter, has never been listed among those who cheated to gain an unfair advantage, has never been listed on any delinquent tax lists or bankruptcy lists for flushing his money away on drugs.”
I just think Ken Griffey, Jr. has class, and he always has. And he says he doesn’t remember touching the bases as he went around…just like a kid in all his glory….loving every moment of it. I've always enjoyed watching Ken Griffey, Jr. play baseball.
One of our autographed baseballs includes one signed by both Ken Griffey, Jr. and his father.
Read about the 600th home run from the Associated Press ç here
And another take on Griffey, about what might have been….he's been plagued with injuries and could have had so much more......
MVN.com ç here
|
By Janet Evans
Monday, May 26 2008, 08:05 AM
 Carolyn and Keith Maupin fight back tears during a memorial service honoring their fallen son, Army Staff Sgt. Matt Maupin, at the Army Reserve Command headquarters at Fort McPherson, Ga., May 22, 2008. Photo by Timothy L. Hale
Comrades, Loved Ones Provide Reminders of Memorial Day’s MeaningBy Donna Miles American Forces Press Service |
| WASHINGTON, May 23, 2008 – |
To many Americans, Memorial Day means a day off from work with parades, pool openings and barbecues. But for those who have lost a comrade or loved one in combat, the day takes on a whole new significance. Here are some of their stories.
Army 1st Lt. Brent Pounders
Army 1st Lt. Brent Pounders remembers his childhood, reading textbooks about patriots who sacrificed their lives through the country’s history and thinking of Memorial Day as the end of the school year.
“You think about it, but [its meaning] really doesn’t hit home or register as much until you lose some of your dear friends and realize that their families are affected by this and what it actually signifies,” he said.
For Pounders, that significance hit home Jan. 20, 2007.
Twelve soldiers died that day when their UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter was shot down east of Baghdad. Among them were three members of Pounders’ unit, the Arkansas Army National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 185th Aviation Regiment, 77th Aviation Brigade, as well as a Texas National Guard soldier who worked closely with them on a day-to-day basis.
Pounds remembers Maj. Michael Taylor, the company commander, for his great sense of humor as he looked out for the best for his unit and held every soldier to the highest standard. | | | |