GreenfieldNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Shorelines


Declining Property Values in Shorewood Could Mean Current Property Owners Face Tax Increases to Pay Off TIF's

By David Tatarowicz
Wednesday, Mar 26 2008, 02:23 PM

The current Shorewood Village Board is spending some big dollars and planning to spend more, and gambling that increasing property values will pay the bill.

Shorewood is using what is called a TIF (tax incremental financing) as a Financing Tool to pay for various projects, such as Streetscaping, the River Project, Condo Development, etc. 

According to the information published by the Wisconsin Dept of Revenue, a TIF works like this:

"Tax Incremental Finance, or TIF, is a financing tool that allows municipalities to invest in infrastructure and other improvements, and pay for these investments by capturing

property tax revenue from the newly developed property. An area is identified (the tax

incremental district, or TID) as appropriate for a certain type of development, and

projects are identified to encourage and facilitate the desired development. Then as

property values rise, the property tax paid on that private development is used by the

municipality to pay for the projects."

There is a risk though, that IF property values Decline, rather than Increase --- All the Property Tax Payers will pay for the expenditures through Increased Property Taxes, as explained here by the Dept of Rev:

" Municipalities can invest significant amounts of money  into  these infrastructure

improvements in hopes that growth will follow (sometimes called the "build it, and

they will come" strategy). However, if little or no private development occurs after the

improvements are made, there may be no tax increment revenue with which to pay for

the investment. If there is no increment revenue, the bonds used to pay for the

improvements will have to be paid for with general tax revenue. Paying for these bonds without a larger tax base means a higher tax burden. Another risk of over-investing can be that the site is improved, but the improvements actually prevent some types of development from being able to use the site."  

The Big Question now becomes --- are Shorewood Property Values Increasing or Decreasing ?

There are many different ways to calculate the values, and with the current volatile real estate market --- it is anybody's guess of what the values will be by the end of the current year. The basic method of calculating property values, involves what is termed "Market Value", and changes in what the sales prices are in comparison between two comparable time periods.  (Other methods of valuation, "replacement" and "income" are not commonly used for residential property appraisals or assessments).

Taking a snapshot of Single Family Home sales in Shorewood for the time period of January 1st of this year (2008) to date, compared with the same time period for last year (2007), there is a notable trend:

JANUARY 1 TO MARCH  26, 2007 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (17 sales)

ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE             DAYS ON MARKET             SALES PRICE

189,900                                               24                                            192,100

214,900                                               169                                          180,000

224,900                                               114                                          215,000

230,000                                               16                                            221,500

259,900                                               126                                          235,000

289,900                                               183                                          237,000

289,000                                               13                                            289,000

298,000                                               46                                            298,100

329,900                                               99                                            295,000

309,000                                               20                                            310,000

320,000                                               45                                            320,000

339,000                                               42                                            335,000

364,900                                               43                                            356,000

387,900                                               68                                            350,000

449,000                                               10                                            460,000

749,000                                               18                                            750,000

1,495,000                                            62                                            1,425,000

Tot  6,740,200                                     1098                                        6,468,700

Avg 396,482                                        65                                            380,511

THERE WAS APPROX A 4% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE

JANUARY 1 TO MARCH  26, 2008 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (9 sales)

ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE             DAYS ON MARKET             SALES PRICE

279,000                                               112                                          237,000

314,900                                               146                                          290,000

399,900                                               141                                          300,000

415,000                                               181                                          376,500

424,900                                               172                                          417,000

479,900                                               91                                            449,000

589,900                                               88                                            555,000

599,900                                               31                                            560,000

1,349,000                                            204                                          1,000,000

Tot  4,852,400                                     1166                                        4,184,500

Avg   539,155                                      130                                          464,944

THERE WAS APPROX A 13% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE, AND DAYS ON MARKET DOUBLED OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

 

WHAT DO YOU THINK ?  YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !

Comments

Ann23   

Dave,

Have you looked at Shorewood's TIF Districts to see how many single-family homes are within their boundaries?  The amount is minimal and only if they are located on a main retail/commercial road.  Here is a map of Shorewood’s TIF:

shorewood.govoffice2.com/.../%7B393AE735-AA6C-4BD6-9CF1-D2F819F2A72F%7D.PDF

If you read the Department of Revenue's report on how TIF works, it states there are four types of TIF Districts with specific purposes:  1) Blighted 2) Rehabilitation or Conservation 3) Mixed-Use and 4) Industrial.  TIFs limit the amount of residential (some specifically limit single-family homes) that can be included.  I work in a city with over 10 TIF Districts and only one of them has single-family homes within the boundary - and only because the homes are completely surrounded by vacant industrial that is being redeveloped.  

Because TIF districts are not meant for single-family homes and Shorewood’s only includes a minimal amount, I don't think your analysis using value declines for single-family homes is an accurate way to assess the risks involved with Shorewood’s TIF district.

There are risks in TIF financing but the benefits are far greater.  TIF financing is a very important tool for municipalities to expand and protect their tax base.  In fact, a recent report stated that Wisconsin is underutilizing TIF districts compared to other states.

March 26, 2008 6:47 PM

David Tatarowicz   

Ann

Thank you for your comments.  From some of your past comments, it is obvious that you have some good working knowledge of real estate and related topics, so I especially appreciate your input.

Looking at your comments, it is obvious I may have made some assumptions that need clearing up.  When making a post, it is always a balancing act between giving too much information and risk losing the reader's attention, and not clarifying enough.

By using Single Family Home comparisons, I did not mean to say that they are included in any of the TIF's -- although, some may be, as you pointed out.  Rather I was using Single Family Homes as the Leading Indicator of where the real estate market --- and thus property values --- may be heading.  

Especially in Shorewood, which is very much a predominantly residential community, if Single Family Home values drop --- that lowering tide will lower all boats -- and the values of all property in Shorewood will take a hit !

Also, if there is a decline in property values --- or even if they are stagnant -- there will NOT be an increase to pay off the TIF, which is paid off in the difference between present value and future increased value.

If the TIF's are not paid off by increased value, ALL property tax will go up, including that of Single Family Homes, even though they are not in the TIF district(s).

As an aside, I don't think that most folks realize that the increase in property value due to TIF financing ONLY goes to the Village, until the TIF is paid off.  The School District, County, etc., receive NONE of the increased valuation until the pay off is done.  Therefore, ALL property taxes support the TIF if the increase in value would have happened without the TIF expenditure, as it locks out the other taxing authorities from that increase in valuation, until the Village pays off the bonds.  And as the Village has pointed out numerous times, the Village portion of the tax bill is NOT the largest !!

Dave

March 26, 2008 8:51 PM

SS77   

Dave,

I have to agree with Ann23, your analysis of "declining property

values" is a little flawed in terms of a TIF discussion.  If you were to analyze commercial property values and come to the same conclusion, your argument may make a little more sense.  What I urge you to remember is that the value of a TIF is looked at in terms of the entire district.  As redevelopment occurs, property values will increase and all of the taxes associated with that increase will go back to the TIF to pay the cost of improvements.  

You may also want to do a little local research...typically, when developments take place within a TIF, a development agreement will demand a minimum increment.  If the property value does not increase as expected, the developer is responsible for the difference between what was expected and what is currently being collected.

March 27, 2008 11:15 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs