GreenfieldNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Shorelines


Now that Sunrise is Sunset --- will Village Assessor Correct Last Year's Assessment

By David Tatarowicz
Friday, Nov 21 2008, 11:24 AM

 In a March 27, 2008 posting to my blog, I noted that the Sunrise Property was incorrectly assessed for value as "vacant" land, while it actually did --- and still does --- consist of land Plus "improvements" (buildings). 

Below is  part of the posting detailing that the assessor dropped almost $600,000 of value from the property, which means all Shorewood taxpayers picked up the difference on their tax bills.

Now that Sunrise is Sunset --- will the Village properly assess the parcel for its current market value --- as prescribed by State Law and Regulations ?

"The property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus had a drastic change in assessment for 2007.

The assessment dropped $598,059 or about 21% of its former assessed value.  In addition, the assessor changed the property from a parcel with improvements to vacant land --- even though there is still an apartment building on the property.

When I questioned the Assessors Office as to why the new assessment discounted the aparment building, I was told that the Assessor knew there was an offer on the property, and that the new owners planned to tear down the building and get TIF funding for a new project --- and that the Assessor valued the property as though is was empty land, based upon what might happen.

In fact, the property had an occupied apartment building and there was not even a closed sale on the property.

In checking with the WI Dept of Rev, they affirmed that the assessment was done incorrectly, and that the property should have been properly assessed with the improvements, and not as vacant land.  Future planned use has no affect on the present use and market value.

The almost $600,000 that the assessor dropped off the value of the property means that all property owners in Shorewood pay more in taxes to make up the difference."

 WHAT DO YOU THINK ?  YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME !

 

Comments

Joe Mangiamele    

David:

I thought that the Village's community development goals were to expand the tax base in the taxpayers' interest, not decrease it in the developer's interest.  But the government of Shorewood has a logic of its own, not to be missed with.

Joe    

November 21, 2008 1:22 PM

William Knox   

David:

In your description you mention that the assessor was aware of a Sunrise offer for the property, land and improvements.  The assessor could plausibly consider that offer to be the best indication of market value for the property as a whole (land plus improvements).  The assessment should be divided back into land and improvements; but, the value for the entire parcel with buildings might actually be 20% less per Sunrise's offer.

No harm, no foul?  

November 21, 2008 2:50 PM

David Tatarowicz   

William

Thank you for your comments.

I do disagree that there was no harm or foul -- the assessment was not properly done, and the lower value resulted in other property owners making up the difference on their taxes.

Every property owner needs to have faith in the assessment process, so that they know that the rules are followed and that they are paying no more than their fair share.

The rules under which assessments are that the Property's Value on the First of the Year is based upon the property as it exists then ...

The Assessor is Not Allowed to extrapolate the value based upon what "might" happen.

For instance --- if the assessor knew that you had contracted to have an addition put onto your house in April --- he or she cannot base the value on January 1st upon that possibility.

Also, being a Realtor myself, I know that an Offer has no value in itself --- there are counter offers, negotiations, inspections, contingencies, etc .............

Dave

November 21, 2008 5:47 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs