GreenfieldNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » TIF » CDA » Taxes (RSS)

Related Tags

Now that Sunrise is Sunset --- will Village Assessor Correct Last Year's Assessment

By David Tatarowicz
Friday, Nov 21 2008, 11:24 AM

 In a March 27, 2008 posting to my blog, I noted that the Sunrise Property was incorrectly assessed for value as "vacant" land, while it actually did --- and still does --- consist of land Plus "improvements" (buildings). 

Below is  part of the posting detailing that the assessor dropped almost $600,000 of value from the property, which means all Shorewood taxpayers picked up the difference on their tax bills.

Now that Sunrise is Sunset --- will the Village properly assess the parcel for its current market value --- as prescribed by State Law and Regulations ?

"The property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus had a drastic change in assessment for 2007.

The assessment dropped $598,059 or about 21% of its former assessed value.  In addition, the assessor changed the property from a parcel with improvements to vacant land --- even though there is still an apartment building on the property.

When I questioned the Assessors Office as to why the new assessment discounted the aparment building, I was told that the Assessor knew there was an offer on the property, and that the new owners planned to tear down the building and get TIF funding for a new project --- and that the Assessor valued the property as though is was empty land, based upon what might happen.

In fact, the property had an occupied apartment building and there was not even a closed sale on the property.

In checking with the WI Dept of Rev, they affirmed that the assessment was done incorrectly, and that the property should have been properly assessed with the improvements, and not as vacant land.  Future planned use has no affect on the present use and market value.

The almost $600,000 that the assessor dropped off the value of the property means that all property owners in Shorewood pay more in taxes to make up the difference."

 WHAT DO YOU THINK ?  YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME !

 


 

Realty Estate Sales Remain Low in Milwaukee Area --- Could be Concern for Paying off Shorewood TIF's

By David Tatarowicz
Monday, May 19 2008, 01:33 PM

According to the Greater Milwaukee Realtor Association, of which I am a member ---- sales in April in the Milwaukee Area were still down: 

If this trend continues, it could affect the repayment of the TIF's the back the spending by the Village on various projects, as the cost of repayment could be spread to all property owners if the TIF properties do not appreciate in value. 

 County-by-county analysis

  • Milwaukee County: 646 units were sold in April; down -21.1% compared to 819 units sold in April 2007, and down -35.3% vs. 2006’s 998. 2,194 properties were listed in April compared to 2,373 in 2007 (-7.5%) and 2,070 in 2006 (6.0% increase). There are 420 pending sales in the county.
  • Waukesha County: 339 units were sold in April; down -20.4% compared to the 426 units sold in April 2007, and down -26.6% vs. 2006’s 463. 947 properties were listed in April compared to 1,030 in 2007 (-8.1%) and 1,038 in 2006 (-8.8%). There are 198 pending sales in Waukesha County.
  • Ozaukee County: 65 units were sold in April; down -20.7% compared to the 82 units sold in April 2007, and down -34.3% vs. 2006’s 99. 193 properties were listed in April compared to 248 in 2007 (-22.2%) and 184 in 2006 (4.9% increase). There are currently 48 pending sales in the county.
  • Washington County: 113 units were sold in April; down -31.9% compared to the 166 units sold in April 2007, and down -23.6% vs. 2006’s 148. 327 properties were listed in April compared to 363 in 2007 (-9.9%) and 273 in 2006 (19.8% increase). Washington County has 58 pending sales.
  • Racine County: 166 units were sold in April; down -23.5% compared to the 217 units sold in April 2007, and down -28.1% vs. 2006’s 231. 468 properties were listed in April compared to 499 in 2007 (-6.2%) and 502 in 2006 (-6.8%). There are 131 pending sales in the county.
  • Kenosha County: 144 units were sold in April; down -16.3% compared to the 172 units sold in April 2007, and down -32.1% vs. 2006’s 212. 475 properties were listed in April compared to 562 in 2007 (-15.5%) and 523 in 2006 (-9.2%). Kenosha County has 101 pending sales.
  • Walworth County: 75 units were sold in April; down -34.2% compared to the 114 units sold in April 2007, and down -48.6% vs. 2006’s 146. 430 properties were listed in April compared to 376 in 2007 (14.4% increase) and 355 in 2006 (21.1% increase). There are 44 pending sales in Walworth County.


  •  

    Tax Assessment on Sunrise Development (TIF Project) Flawed

    By David Tatarowicz
    Thursday, Mar 27 2008, 05:57 PM

     I had noted in an earlier posting that a major TIF property had a questionable assessment.

    The property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus had a drastic change in assessment for 2007.

    The assessment dropped $598,059 or about 21% of its former assessed value.  In addition, the assessor changed the property from a parcel with improvements to vacant land --- even though there is still an apartment building on the property.

    When I questioned the Assessors Office as to why the new assessment discounted the aparment building, I was told that the Assessor knew there was an offer on the property, and that the new owners planned to tear down the building and get TIF funding for a new project --- and that the Assessor valued the property as though is was empty land, based upon what might happen.

    In fact, the property had an occupied apartment building and there was not even a closed sale on the property.

    In checking with the WI Dept of Rev, they affirmed that the assessment was done incorrectly, and that the property should have been properly assessed with the improvements, and not as vacant land.  Future planned use has no affect on the present use and market value.

    The almost $600,000 that the assessor dropped off the value of the property means that all property owners in Shorewood pay more in taxes to make up the difference.

    Also when the TIF district does their calculations on the increase of value on the property, they will have an extra cushion of $600,000 that will go to the TIF and not to the schools, county, MATC, etc ......  which again will be taxes shifted from that property to other property owners in Shorewood.

    Following are the assessments for the Sherburn property for the past few years, applying the applicable State Equalizers:

    Sherburn                                      Land                           Improvements                    Total

    2004                                           474,000                        1,627,240                         2,101,240

    2005                                           507,900                         2,250,282                        2,758,182

    2006                                           530,425                         2,350,081                        2,880,506

    2007                                          2,282,447                       00000000                         2,282,447

                          This is a drop in the assessment of $598,059  which equals a 21% drop in value !!

     

    HERE IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL TAX REPORT THAT STEVE REQUESTED I POST

     

    Full Report
    Property Location : 3907-3909 N Sherburn PL

     

    Taxed by: Village Of Shorewood

    Owner :

    Taxkey # 2758992002

    Toohey John L & Barbara
    16620 Woods Edge CT
    Brookfield, WI 53005-3548

    Owner Occupied:
    Property Address :
    3907-3909 N Sherburn PL
    Shorewood, WI 53211-1870

    County: Milwaukee
    Taxed by: Village Of Shorewood
    Taxkey # 2758992002

    Assessments

     

    Assessment
    Year

    Property
    Class

    Land
    Assessment

    Improvement
    Assessment

    Total
    Assessment

    Percent
    Of Change

    Acres

    Ratio

    2007

    Commercial

    $ 2,275,600

     

    $ 2,275,600

    42.671

     

    0.997760393

    2006

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    0.000

     

    0.678759286

    2005

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    0.000

     

    0.708868690

    2004

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    0.000

     

    0.759208547

    2003

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    0.000

     

    0.813959753

    2002

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    0.000

     

    0.849216789

    2001

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    0.000

     

    0.935897456

    2000

    Commercial

    $ 360,000

    $ 1,235,000

    $ 1,595,000

    39.423

     

    1.032343920

    1999

    Commercial

    $ 295,500

    $ 848,500

    $ 1,144,000

    0.000

     

    0.820232669

    1998

    Commercial

    $ 295,500

    $ 848,500

    $ 1,144,000

    0.000

     

     

    1997

    Commercial

    $ 295,500

    $ 848,500

    $ 1,144,000

    0.000

     

     

    1996

    Commercial

    $ 295,500

    $ 848,500

    $ 1,144,000

     

     

     

    Taxes

     

    Tax Year

    Tax Before
    Lottery Credit

    Lottery
    Credit

    Tax After
    Lottery Credit

    Special
    Taxes

    Special
    Assessment

    Special
    Charges

    Full Pay
    Amount

    Ratio

    2007

    $53,389.56

     

    $53,389.56

     

     

     

    $53,389.56

    0.997760393

    2006

    $53,853.11

     

    $53,853.11

     

     

     

    $53,853.11

    0.678759286

    2005

    $52,997.66

     

    $52,997.66

     

     

     

    $52,997.66

    0.708868690

    2004

    $53,832.28

     

    $53,832.28

     

     

     

    $53,832.28

    0.759208547

    2003

    $53,059.26

     

    $53,059.26

     

     

     

    $53,059.26

    0.813959753

    2002

    $51,306.80

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0.849216789

    2001

    $47,507.55

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0.935897456

    2000

    $44,840.64

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1.032343920

    1999

    $41,988.42

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0.820232669

    1998

    $41,760.54

    $70.45

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1997

    $42,445.56

    $111.27

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1996

    $42,242.48

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Assessor

     

    Building Square Feet :

    Year Built :

    Township :

    7N

    Bedrooms :

    Year Remodeled :

    Range :

    22E

    Full Baths :

    Effective Year Built :

    Section :

    9

    Half Baths :

    Air Conditioning :

    Quarter :

    Total Rooms :

    Fireplace :

    Pool :

    Number of Stories :

    Number of Units :

    Attic :

     

    Building Type :

    Basement :

    Exterior Wall :

    Heat :

    Exterior Condition :

    Garage :

    Land Use :

    School District :

    5355 Shorewood School District

    Zoning :

    Historic Designation :

    Legal Description

     

    Lands In Ne 1/4 Sec 9-7-22 Com 92.12' Sely Of Intersec Of S Li Of E Capitol DR &...

    Sales

     

                        WHAT DO YOU THINK?               YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !


     

    Declining Property Values in Shorewood Could Mean Current Property Owners Face Tax Increases to Pay Off TIF's

    By David Tatarowicz
    Wednesday, Mar 26 2008, 02:23 PM

    The current Shorewood Village Board is spending some big dollars and planning to spend more, and gambling that increasing property values will pay the bill.

    Shorewood is using what is called a TIF (tax incremental financing) as a Financing Tool to pay for various projects, such as Streetscaping, the River Project, Condo Development, etc. 

    According to the information published by the Wisconsin Dept of Revenue, a TIF works like this:

    "Tax Incremental Finance, or TIF, is a financing tool that allows municipalities to invest in infrastructure and other improvements, and pay for these investments by capturing

    property tax revenue from the newly developed property. An area is identified (the tax

    incremental district, or TID) as appropriate for a certain type of development, and

    projects are identified to encourage and facilitate the desired development. Then as

    property values rise, the property tax paid on that private development is used by the

    municipality to pay for the projects."

    There is a risk though, that IF property values Decline, rather than Increase --- All the Property Tax Payers will pay for the expenditures through Increased Property Taxes, as explained here by the Dept of Rev:

    " Municipalities can invest significant amounts of money  into  these infrastructure

    improvements in hopes that growth will follow (sometimes called the "build it, and

    they will come" strategy). However, if little or no private development occurs after the

    improvements are made, there may be no tax increment revenue with which to pay for

    the investment. If there is no increment revenue, the bonds used to pay for the

    improvements will have to be paid for with general tax revenue. Paying for these bonds without a larger tax base means a higher tax burden. Another risk of over-investing can be that the site is improved, but the improvements actually prevent some types of development from being able to use the site."  

    The Big Question now becomes --- are Shorewood Property Values Increasing or Decreasing ?

    There are many different ways to calculate the values, and with the current volatile real estate market --- it is anybody's guess of what the values will be by the end of the current year. The basic method of calculating property values, involves what is termed "Market Value", and changes in what the sales prices are in comparison between two comparable time periods.  (Other methods of valuation, "replacement" and "income" are not commonly used for residential property appraisals or assessments).

    Taking a snapshot of Single Family Home sales in Shorewood for the time period of January 1st of this year (2008) to date, compared with the same time period for last year (2007), there is a notable trend:

    JANUARY 1 TO MARCH  26, 2007 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (17 sales)

    ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE             DAYS ON MARKET             SALES PRICE

    189,900                                               24                                            192,100

    214,900                                               169                                          180,000

    224,900                                               114                                          215,000

    230,000                                               16                                            221,500

    259,900                                               126                                          235,000

    289,900                                               183                                          237,000

    289,000                                               13                                            289,000

    298,000                                               46                                            298,100

    329,900                                               99                                            295,000

    309,000                                               20                                            310,000

    320,000                                               45                                            320,000

    339,000                                               42                                            335,000

    364,900                                               43                                            356,000

    387,900                                               68                                            350,000

    449,000                                               10                                            460,000

    749,000                                               18                                            750,000

    1,495,000                                            62                                            1,425,000

    Tot  6,740,200                                     1098                                        6,468,700

    Avg 396,482                                        65                                            380,511

    THERE WAS APPROX A 4% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE

    JANUARY 1 TO MARCH  26, 2008 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (9 sales)

    ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE             DAYS ON MARKET             SALES PRICE

    279,000                                               112                                          237,000

    314,900                                               146                                          290,000

    399,900                                               141                                          300,000

    415,000                                               181                                          376,500

    424,900                                               172                                          417,000

    479,900                                               91                                            449,000

    589,900                                               88                                            555,000

    599,900                                               31                                            560,000

    1,349,000                                            204                                          1,000,000

    Tot  4,852,400                                     1166                                        4,184,500

    Avg   539,155                                      130                                          464,944

    THERE WAS APPROX A 13% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE, AND DAYS ON MARKET DOUBLED OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

     

    WHAT DO YOU THINK ?  YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !


     

    Tax Assessment on River Property Changes Dramatically (and lower) --- Why ?

    By David Tatarowicz
    Tuesday, Mar 4 2008, 01:53 PM

    According to property tax information available on the internet, the property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus has changed dramatically for 2007.

    The past assessments for the Sherburn property had a separate assessment for the land and a separate assessment for the improvements (buildings) which is the normal breakdown, and is the way that the property at 1111 E Capitol (Riverbrook Restaurant) is assessed.

    Following are the assessments for the Sherburn property for the past few years, applying the applicable State Equalizers:

    Sherburn                                      Land                           Improvements                    Total

    2004                                           474,000                        1,627,240                         2,101,240

    2005                                           507,900                         2,250,282                        2,758,182

    2006                                           530,425                         2,350,081                        2,880,506

    2007                                          2,282,447                       00000000                         2,282,447

                          This is a drop in the assessment of $598,059  which equals a 21% drop in value !!

                          (note: the 1111 E Capitol Dr property had a decrease in its assessment of about 4%)

    • Is this the only property in Shorewood that has dropped in value by 21% ?
    • Why is the assessment no longer broken down into its parts ?
    • What implications does this have for the proposed Sunrise Development ?
    •  Inquiring Minds Want to Know !!

                                         Do you Know ?            Do you have any Comments ?


     
    More Posts

    Posts

    Tags

    Search the Blogs